Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
1982-1992 Camaro Pro+ Brake System Rear 4302395HOFits 1982 92 GM F Body Cars w OE Saginaw 10 Bolt C clip (BIH) Drum Brake Housing Ends Features: 2 Piece, 6 Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum Powder Coated Finish Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear Dual Seals, Dust Weather & Pressure 2 Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc Plate Rotor w Billet Aluminum Hat Specs:
Fits 1982-92 GM F-Body Cars w/OE Saginaw 10 Bolt C-clip (BIH) Drum Brake Housing Ends
Features:
- 2-Piece, 6-Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ
- CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum
- Powder Coated Finish
- Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips
- Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear
- Dual Seals, Dust/Weather & Pressure
- 2-Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc-Plate Rotor w/Billet Aluminum Hat
Specs:
| Applications | GM F-Body 82-92 |
|---|---|
| Axle | Rear |
| Brand | Baer Brakes |
| Caliper | 6P |
| Caliper Color | Hugger Orange |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Piston Quantity | 6 |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Type | Floating |
| Disc Brake Pad FMSI Number | D0731 |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Construction | Vented |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Outside Diameter | 13.000IN |
| Emission Code | 6 |
| Export Description | Brake Components |
| Fitment Notes | w/OE Saginaw 10 Bolt C-clip (BIH) Drum Brake Housing End |
| Grade Type | Performance |
| Hose Material | Stainless Steel |
| Includes Park Brake | Yes |
| Includes Park Brake Cables | Yes |
| Lug Count | 5 Lug |
| Min Wheel Dia (verify using template) | 17IN |
| Product Line | 13 Inch Pro+ |
| Product Type | 13 Inch Pro+ Rear Brake Kit |
| Prop 65 (C, R or CR) | CR |
| Prop 65 - Long Label | WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including Toluene Diisocyanate, and Nickel which are known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 - Short Label | WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm. www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 Yes/No | Yes |
| Rotor Thickness | 1.100IN |
| Rotor Type | 2-Piece |
| Surface Type | Slotted, Drilled & Zinc Plated |
| System Notes | Fits stock Saginaw 10 bolt C-clip rear end w/OE drum brakes |
| Template | Q082H |
| Title | Pro+ Brake System Rear |
| Wheel Lug/Bolt Pattern | 5x4.75 |
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1982-1992 | Chevrolet | Camaro | |
| 1982-1992 | Pontiac | Firebird |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 304 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Recomiendo Mucho Estas Franelas, le va Gustar en lo la Usen
Size: Large, Color: White
Es Excelente y de Tela Muy Suave, se Adapta al Cuerpo Cómodamente.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 27, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Good~~!!
Great shirts! ^_^ no flaws
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable and cool. Does not ride up.
Color: 01-multicolour (4-pack), Size: Medium
Extremely comfortable. Stays cool. Ample coverage. Quality material. They do not creep up. I ordered a medium which I generally take a size small. I have reordered and will reorder again to add more colors to my collection.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great Value for Cool Thigh Protection
Color: 02-multicolour (4-pack), Size: XX-Large
For the price, I'm not sure there are better women's boxer shortlettes anywhere. I've tried more expensive brands, and for quality and cooling, these are right up there. I have other bamboo viscose undies that still get gross when I get sweaty in the summer, but these, with the large mesh panel, really help wick away a lot of that moisture, keeping you feeling dryer and cooler. I find that the leg openings are comfortable and don't roll up! and the waist band doesn't dig, nor does it roll down. These do not provide any compression, and I wasn't looking for any. I just wanted some cooling, thigh protecting women's boxers that wouldn't break the bank. These are them! Bonus- I've washed them and put them in the dryer (following their instructions), and they haven't shrunk; they look about the same and are nice and soft.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 28, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Great for the entire family but expensive
So far so good. The brand of boxers we had been buying changed their style and construction so we needed to find an alternative. These have held up well so far to multiple weeks of frequent washing and wearing from the entire family. We did size up from the usual 6/M we normally buy and ordered large to prevent the legs from rolling up which worked out great. Our daughter likes the length and how soft the fabric is for wearing under skirts and gym shorts and liners stay put without moving or leaking as another reviewer mentioned. Our son says they are comfortable and fit well being just supportive enough without being constrictive. We all agree that there seems to be not enough fabric in the back as they tend to be much tighter across the backside than the front and that also causes the waist band to ride lower in the back than the front. These have better seam placement than some brands we tried with no seam across the lady bits and no seam down the middle of the back side so they are more much comfortable but the cost is also much higher and that is why we're only giving it 4 stars. These will stay in the rotation until we find something cheaper that both us and the kids like.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2026